Mathematics Behind pH Buffer Calculations

Mathematics Behind pH Buffer Calculations

17 Nov 2025Efflux TeamEfflux Team4 min read

The Difference Between Thermodynamic pKa and Apparent pKa

A buffer species with a single protonated state is defined as

HAz+1H++AzHA^{z+1} \rightleftharpoons H^+ + A^z
(1)

where HAHA is a weak acid, AA the conjugate base, and zz the charge of the conjugate base.

It follows that the dissociation constant is defined as

Ka=[H+][Az][HAz+1]K_a = \frac{[H^+] [A^z]}{[HA^{z+1}]}
(2)

The dissociation constant, KaK_a, is however more commonly presented as its own negative logarithm

pKa=log(Ka)pK_a = -log(K_a)
(3)

Substituting and rearranging, we get the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation

pKa=pHlog([Az][HAz+1])pK_a = pH -log\bigg(\frac{[A^z]}{[HA^{z+1}]}\bigg)
(4)

However, this is only true under ideal conditions. In reality, many non-idealities exist. For example, any free ion XX would be shielded by oppositely charged ions in the solution. This changes the apparent concentration of XX. It can be said that the activity of XX changes. The activity is therefore defined as

aX=γX[X]a_X = \gamma_X[X]
(5)

where aXa_X is the activity, γX\gamma_X is the activity coefficient, and [X][X] is the concentration of XX, respectively.

Substituting the concentrations with the corresponding activities in equation (4), we get that

pKa=pHlog(aAaHAz+1)=pHlog(γA[A]γHA[HA])pK_a' = pH -log\bigg(\frac{a_A}{a_{HA^{z+1}}}\bigg) = pH - log\bigg(\frac{\gamma_A[A]}{\gamma_{HA}[HA]}\bigg)
=pHlog([A][HA])log(γAγHA) = pH - log\bigg(\frac{[A]}{[HA]}\bigg) - log\bigg(\frac{\gamma_A}{\gamma_{HA}}\bigg)
(6)

and thus

pKa=pKalog(γAγHA)pK_a' = pK_a - log\bigg(\frac{\gamma_A}{\gamma_{HA}}\bigg)
(7)

where pKapK_a' is the apparent pKa under specific conditions, and pKapK_a is the thermodynamic pKa, determined at ideal conditions.

The activity coefficients vary widely for different species and under different conditions and must be determined experimentally.

How Temperature Influences pKa

The dissociation of a buffer species is an equilibrium process, and like all equilibria, it is affected by temperature. The enthalpy of dissociation, ΔH\Delta H, governs how the equilibrium shifts as temperature changes. To a first-order approximation, this temperature dependence is linear and can be written as

pKa(T)=pKa(Tref)+dpKadT(TTref)pK_a(T) = pK_a(T_{ref}) + \frac{dpK_a}{dT}(T - T_{ref})
(8)

where Tref=298T_{ref} = 298 K (25°C) is the standard reference temperature at which pKapK_a values are typically reported, and dpKadT\frac{dpK_a}{dT} is the temperature coefficient of the buffer species.

The magnitude and sign of dpKadT\frac{dpK_a}{dT} varies considerably between buffers. Tris, for example, has a temperature coefficient of approximately 0.028-0.028 K-1, meaning its pKa decreases by roughly 0.28 units for every 10°C increase. Phosphate, by contrast, has a coefficient of only 0.0024-0.0024 K-1. This has important practical consequences: a Tris buffer prepared at 25°C and used at 4°C will have a pH approximately 0.6 units higher than intended, while a phosphate buffer under the same shift will change by less than 0.05 units.

How Ionic Strength Influences Apparent pKa

The presence of ions changes the activity of any acid-base pair. However, different acids are more affected than others.

The ionic strength of a solution is defined as

I=12i=1ncizi2I = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i z_i^2
(9)

where cic_i is the concentration of ion ii, and ziz_i is the charge of ion ii.

Empirical correlations between the activity of an acid-base pair and the ionic strength of the solution have been determined [1]. Substituting these into equation (7) and combining with the temperature correction from equation (8), we get the complete expression for the apparent pKa

pKa=pKa+dpKadT(TTref)+(2z+1)(βI1+I0.1I)pK_a' = pK_a + \frac{dpK_a}{dT}(T - T_{ref}) + (2z+1)\bigg(\beta\frac{\sqrt{I}}{1+\sqrt{I}} - 0.1I\bigg)
(10)

where zz is the charge of the conjugate base and

β=1.825×106×(εT)3/2\beta = 1.825 \times 10^6 \times (\varepsilon T)^{-3/2}
(11)

and

ε=87.70.400(TC)+9.40×104(TC)21.41×106(TC)3\varepsilon = 87.7 - 0.400(T_C) + 9.40 \times 10^{-4}(T_C)^2 - 1.41 \times 10^{-6}(T_C)^3
(12)

where TT is the temperature in Kelvin and TCT_C is the temperature in Celsius [2].

From the ionic strength term in equation (10), we see that for acids with a neutral or a positively charged conjugate base, the apparent pKa increases with increasing ionic strength. Conversely, for acids with a negatively charged conjugate base, the apparent pKa decreases with increasing ionic strength.

Figure showing difference between thermodynamic pKa and apparent pKa at different ionic strengths
Figure 1: Apparent pKa as a function of ionic strength for buffer species with different conjugate base charges. Buffers with a negatively charged conjugate base see their pKa' decrease with increasing ionic strength, while those with a neutral or positively charged conjugate base see an increase.

When calculating the apparent pKa in equation (10), it is important to recognize that the calculated apparent pKa affects the equilibrium ratio of the acidic and basic components of the buffer. This in turn leads to a change in total ionic strength of the solution, which subsequently affects the apparent pKa. It thus becomes an iterative problem to solve, with the calculated apparent pKa converging to a stable value after just a few iterations.

If you need to accurately calculate the recipe to create a buffer of a certain pH, taking ionic strength from salt additives and temperature into account, you can use our free-to-use buffer calculator.

References

  1. K. J. Ellis and J. F. Morrison. Buffers of Constant ionic Strength for Studying pH-Dependent Processes.
  2. C. G. Malmberg and A. A. Maryott. Dielectric Constant of Water from 0° to 100° C.

Want to know more?

Efflux provides chromatography modeling and simulation software and services to leading biopharma companies.